A lawyer from Britain’s prince Harry on Tuesday slammed a “unfair” verdict to downed his police security, stating that Rajkumar in a London court recently faced paprazi and even al-Qaeda threats.
After the partition of Harry with the royal family in 2020 and moved to the US with his wife Meghan, the government decided that they would be decided in terms of their security during the UK visit.
The youngest son of King Charles III made a rare visit to London for the latest phase of long -running legal saga, with his appeal from inside the royal courts of justice.
Clothing in a dark suit with a blue tie, she saw in court, sometimes whispering her soliciter and wrote in a notebook.
After 40 -year -old Harry, in 2020, a working royal is considered, the government decided that it would not get a “identical degree” of publicly funded protection in Britain.
Rajkumar took legal action against the Internal Ministry in 2021, and after his initial case was rejected last year, he made a challenge before the court.
Advocate Shaheed Fatima told the court that Rajkumar was “excluded for a separate, inappropriate and inferior treatment.”
In a written submission, his lawyers highlighted the dangers against the prince.
“Al-Qaeda recently called to kill (Harry),” and he and Meghan in May 2023 “were involved in chasing a dangerous car with paparas in New York City”, without providing full details, without offering.
Harry was widely criticized when in his autobiography “Spare” he claimed that 25 people were claimed to be killed in Afghanistan, who was sparking an Ire from the Taliban.
Harry has long been harassed by the death of her mother, Princess Diana, who was killed in a high -speed car accident in Paris in 1997, as she tried to escape from Paprazi photographers.
Harry and Meghan have started a new life in California and now they are largely different from the royal family.
But Rajkumar has said that security concerns have hindered their ability to travel to Britain, and their trips have usually been fleeting.
In a written submission, Harry’s lawyers stated that Rajkumar and Meghan “felt forced to retreat from the frontline royal duties” because “he believed that he was not protected by the institute”.
Failure to assess risk
On the decision to downgrade its security in February 2020, the Rajkumar’s Legal Battle Center relates to the protection of a committee and Royals and public data formed by the Interior Ministry.
In early 2024, the High Court ruled against Harry’s case, saying that the government has done a legal work.
According to the Times newspaper, Rajkumar’s initial dialect was rejected in April last year and or was ordered to pay about 1,000,000 pounds ($ 1.27 million) in legal costs.
However, next month, a judge said that Harry could challenge the appeal’s decision in the court.
On Tuesday, Harry’s lawyer argued that the committee had failed to assess the risks to the prince and the High Court had done wrong to ignore it.
The prince nodded his head, determining the government’s case as a lawyer representing the internal ministry.
James ED said that Aadhaar was “adjusted due to a change in his position and because he was now going to live abroad for his time’s majority.”
In its written submission, the government emphasized Harry’s safety “based on circumstances”. ,
The two -day hearing ends on Wednesday with some parts of privately held due to security concerns. A decision in writing is expected in the latter date.
(Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is published by a syndicated feed.)
