Court room drama in Indian cinema has always been one of the favorite styles for the audience in the country. This is especially because, in most examples, these films take a very important social message that resonates at the emotional level with the audience. ‘Hi Nanna’ presented by actor Nani, a court – a sensitive Indian laws, do not touch sensitive Indian laws such as the POCSO Act (Sexual Offenses Act) on sensitive Indian laws, using adolescent romance as a central struggle.

Chandu (Harsh Roshan), a 19 -year -old boy who occupies himself with strange jobs throughout the day, falls in love with 17 -year -old Jabili (Sridevi), an intermediate student. Chandu is the son of a watchman, while Jabili belongs to a prestigious house. This difference in the situation becomes a matter of prestige and pride for Jabili’s uncle, Mangapati (Shivaji).

Chandu is one day arrested by the police while spending time with Jabili and is now facing allegations of blackmail, sexual harassment and a POCSO case, as Jabili is a minor. A colleague lawyer, Surya Teja (Priyadarshi), what will he do when he comes in this matter? The answer to this question makes the film’s crux.

Here is the trailer of the film:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keziwmmh_u

Director Ram Jagdish has chosen a highly sensitive issue as the foundation of his story yet. While the debut director shows the promise to confuse the audience with reliable issues and stronger feelings, it is reduced to prepare an exciting court case. He effectively presents the social message he has to explain but struggles to create a compelling and intelligent legal battle.

The film highlights important social issues, especially to protect them about the lack of awareness between young adults and adolescents. Laws such as the POCSO Act are highly sensitive, harsh and harsh for appropriate reasons. But can it be really justified when an innocent boy is placed behind bars to fall in love with a minor who is barely two years younger than him? The doors open for important discussions in this idea-elastic question presented by the film.

The performance in the film is satisfactory throughout the board. Artists have demanded script, working for an experience at the surface level. Priyadarshi gives a solid performance as an up-end-and-one lawyer who is eager to shine. Innocent chemistry between rigorous Roshan and Sridevi is admirable. However, Shivaji turned out to be a show-styller in the form of arrogant Mangapati.

The music of Vijai Bulginin is an average experience. The background score, in particular, is over -used in a few moments, forcibly making the impression of emotions. The cinematography in the film is commendable, although the editing parts are participated in.

Overall, the court – the state versus can be an attractive watch for those looking for a reliable story with any innocence and fast justice. However, if you are expecting a recreational court drama, this court fails to make its case strongly.

A court was issued in theaters on March 14, on 13 March, on 13 March, with selected premiere.