Hollywood star Ben Affleck recently became the subject of considerable online attention after he shared his thoughts on the current landscape of artificial intelligence during a guest appearance. The Joe Rogan Experience. His comments, which addressed the perceived limitations of AI, quickly circulated across social media platforms, where both creatives and audiences reacted with surprise and respect for his insights. The discussion, which took place amid a growing debate about the impact of AI on creative professions, highlighted Affleck’s nuanced approach and inspired thought among writers and industry professionals.

Affleck’s comments questioned the ability of AI tools like ChatGPT, Cloud, and Gemini to generate original or impactful creative work. Speaking bluntly, Affleck said, “If you try to write something off of ChatGPT or Cloud or Gemini, it’s really crap. And that’s because, by its nature, it tends to average out, and it’s not reliable,” directly challenging the notion that AI can replace human creativity in fields like screenwriting and filmmaking.

Watch the video here:

Social media users quickly responded, expressing praise for Affleck’s understanding of the topic. One user commented, “Honestly, I was surprised by Ben Affleck actually knowing AI and scenario, but as a writer, it makes sense,” adding, “Great move across the board.” These comments reflect a broad sense of approval within creative circles, where concerns about the potential impact of AI remain a topic of ongoing discussion.

Another user on This sentiment was reinforced by further posts, in which one contributor outlined the practical uses of AI, but drew a line at its creative limitations: “Largely agreed. AI is a great tool for analyzing thousands of customer testimonials, analyzing your competition, and spot patterns. It’s useful as a co-pilot to reiterate your ideas. But it can’t write impactful headlines. Because it’s trained to be average.”

During the podcast, Affleck also addressed the economic motivations behind the hype surrounding AI’s perceived threat to creative jobs. He said, “I think a lot of the rhetoric comes from people who are trying to justify the valuations of companies, like, ‘We’ll change everything. In two years, there won’t be any more work.’ They’re saying this because they need to determine a valuation for the investment,” suggesting that market forces may be exaggerating the risks posed by AI.

Affleck’s views sparked further debate about the future of creative careers, with some supporters pointing to the importance of maintaining human input in storytelling and artistic endeavors. The discussion moved beyond the capabilities of AI, reflecting deeper concerns about the future of the creative industries and the pressures on those working within them.

Some reactions focused on Affleck himself, with social media users expressing surprise at his technical knowledge. Cody Sanchez posted, “Who was completely unaware of how smart Ben Affleck is?” While Steve Skoczek replied, “He’s actually very intelligent. It’s surprised me before.” These comments contributed to the story’s renewed appreciation for Affleck’s intellectual engagement with technology topics.

The wide-ranging conversation continues to capture the attention of both industry professionals and fans, as Affleck’s comments resonate with the ongoing debate about the role of artificial intelligence in the creative field. Online reaction highlights a mix of approval of Affleck’s outspokenness and ongoing concern about the balance between technological progress and the preservation of authentic creative expression.