The way we see relationships have developed. There was a time when marriage was the final commitment, and people saw those who demanded divorce for any reason (domestic abuse, mental torture, infidelity). Of course, the idea of ​​a man or woman to not marry was equally condemned. But things are changing for better.

Moving values, growing individualism, and economic factors are changing the way Indians’ approach to relationships. The divorce rate is increasing, more individuals are now open to the idea of ​​leading the same life, and Dink (dual income, no children) pairs are growing.

And this, your mind, is not the only eccentric perception that we have strong data to prove it. The longest time, India was one of the lowest divorce rates in the world, only 1% (nothing to be proud, and you know why). However, last year, a moneycontrol analysis of data from the periodic labor force survey has shown that Indians are now getting more divorced than seven years ago, and the ratio of divorced or separate women in rural areas is also increasing.

In fact, a dating app, according to a study conducted by Bumble, about 81% of Indian women prefer to live the same life.

Another study in Investopedia suggests that about 65% of newly married Indian couples should not have a child.

So, you see how marriage has changed as an institution. Relationships, marriages and children now mean debate. But do you think that these changes can have an effect, whether it is positive or negative, on society?

What does increase in divorce rates in India explain?

There are many reasons for growth, but the main one is to be better Financial freedom,

The founder of Gayatri Sapru, CEO and Folk Frequency (Cultural Strategy Consultation), throw light on gender mobility developed in sports.

“Women divorce in about 70% of cases globally, and India is no different. Financial freedom has given them the power to quit unhappy marriage, and is reducing social pressure to marry the young. Parents are equipped with daughters with education and skills so that they can support themselves if needed,” she notes.

Dr. Chandni Tuganit, psychiatrist and founder-director of the Gateway of Healing, emphasize the role of changing priorities.

“Marriage is No longer about dutyIt is about mutual respect and personal development. Many couples struggle with emotional intimacy, growing with digital distractions. If a marriage becomes hard or becomes toxic, people are open to end it instead of making it permanent. ,

Also, the new generation wants break free From the hut of the old mentality, where the “society will think” comes first instead of a person’s personal good.

Delhi -based psychological and marriage consultant Dr. Nisha Khanna says, “Millennials and General Z Priority Individual welfareCareer goals, and emotional welfare before being committed to marriage. Marriage is now seen as just one aspect of life rather than a requirement. People are delaying marriage to focus their career, marrying many in the late 30s with their 30s. Freedom is given more importance than ever, with less individuals to compromise for family or social expectations. ,

A conscious option to be single

Ayee Haaye, are you still single at 30? This would be a common response of aunt and uncle for individuals who were “unfortunate”, which was not enough to find a suit before the society understood as the right marriageable age. Once there was an embarrassment, a taboo and it was believed that a graduate or spinner was either unfortunate or alone. However, the story is slowly changing but continuously.

For some, singlehood is a way to avoid harsh social expectations. “It’s not about rejecting love or companionship, but often about rejecting the toxic structures that come with them,” says Tuggit. “This allows people to recover time, energy and mental space without pressure from traditional roles.”

In addition, Dr. Khanna says that the single is now seen as a path for empowerment. “Many people, especially millennia and general Z, are delayed in marriage in favor of personal development, financial freedom and career ambitions or even rejecting marriage.”

Long -term influence on society

Cementini Ghosh, assistant professor of psychology at Ashok University, mentions possible changes in birth rates over the next few years, although nothing is significant.

She believes that in the next two decades, romantic relationships will be applied and re -implemented, with the spread of dating apps, in an increase SituationAnd in speed dating shooting shooting, especially among its 20 and 30s among people. Emotional unavailability will also become more normal.

“Rapid, people will probably look for more quick satisfaction and deny work and time that makes it take a deep bond. However, this trend is mostly educated in Tier 1 and 2 cities for a young, urban, upper-middle-class, educated India. I do not make any major changes in the pattern of the relationship in a large part of the country, ”she says.

Positive or negative effects?

While Pr. Ghosh mentions that ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ are highly subjective words, it also predicts a future that can feel alone.

Pro. Ghosh further said that when we can see more loneliness, isolation, and narrowness against the collective nature of Indian culture at the same time, people no longer want to live.

“I do nuclear families to become more normal, and are getting more acceptance in single paternity society, as well as non-traditional forms of parenting and child’s upbringing, especially in urban metro.”

“It is only an adventurous hope that society accepts plural and non-traditional families, children are adopted in the same-sex parents’ homes, with equal acceptance with the same acceptance of children from traditional families. Especially in terms of India beyond the metros, I see a lot of loneliness for the elderly because the younger generation goes to cities in search of livelihood, ”she says.

Is India moving towards a individualist society?

A individualist society (US, Sweden) is the one where personal freedom, self -reliance and personal goals are given priority on the interests of collective or group, moving towards one in India? Pro. Ghosh feels that the answer is subjective.

They believe that the answer depends on many factors, where a person lives, their cultural background, their relationship with indigenous roots and their social level. In view of India’s ongoing urbanization, Prof. Ghosh suggests that people are likely to become more individualist. However, only 30% of the population living in cities, the majority, 70%, is still out of urban effects.

“Indian society is not a united, homogeneous unit, has never been. I think complex cultures develop in an unexpected manner influenced by market forces, politics and natural resource changes. These will continue to change how people behave within relationships in future, ”she concludes.