Why Telugu Courtroom Drama ‘Court’ deserves your undivided meditation
‘Court – State vs. a No No’ on Netflix is an entertaining Telugu film that arrives deeply in the harsh realities of love and social prejudices. It powerfully portrays the misuse of the POCSO Act, while the square exposes the division, making it a thought-respective watch that performs the penis after a long time of the credit roll.

Let’s be real – most court room drama formulas. Some hot monologue, a stunning witness, and boom – justice served. But ‘Court – State vs. a No No’, the latest Telugu Mani on Netflix, hoisted the style on her head. It does not just tell a story. It shakes you, bothers you, and you question all the things you thought that you knew about love, law and life in small town India.
If you think that this is just one more legal drama, then here are some reasons that ‘court’ should be an absolute.
Teen love, but make it tragic
There is a love story in the heart of ‘Court’ – but this is not your Pawan Kalyan’s’ Kushi -style romance. It is teenage love in its ratio, misleading form. Two teenagers find solitude in each other in a world that does not understand them. Starts as innocent companionship, takes a terrible twist, reminding us that young love does not always meet with rose petals and violins. His story is still sad, and later no less than destructive. This is a shock of reality – how society and law consider adolescent feelings with zero nuances. Seeing their journey unfollowing is like looking at a car accident at a slow pace – you can’t see far, even if it hurts.
AdvertisementSee this post on InstagramA post shared by Priyadarshi Pulikonda (@Preyadarshe)
Class divide that makes deep cuts
Forget what you have seen in Glossy City Drama. The ‘court’ throws you in the heart of a small town India, somewhere on the outskirts of Visakhapatnam, where your last name, your pronunciation, and even your school uniform can decide your fate. Not only luck, it reminds you of your boundaries.
The film does not promote – it just shows. The 17 -year -old Jabili (starred by Sridevi Apala) comes from a slightly better family. Boy Chandu? ,
The subtlety in a court view shows that the same crime is seen differently which depends on who does it. Amir gets a lawyer. Poor. Well, they drag, beat, falsely accused and label. It is a cruel reminder that justice is not always blind – it is often just selective and privileges.
No star-power, only raw talent
The only star-power ‘Court: State vs. a no no’ is supported by a famous actor Nani in the Telugu film industry. There is no big life here. Any slow pace “Objection, your respect!” Moment. The artist of ‘Court’ is the fresh key – and it is the biggest flex of the film. Our 19 -year -old Mettu is Chandrashekhar alias Chandu, who is allegedly implicated in the POCSO Act to kidnap Jabili, by his harsh supremacist uncle Mangapati (played by Shivaji). Why? Because his net bond fired his ‘influential family honors’.
Regarding the POCSO Act and tender teenage love, the deeper roots fight against prejudices, which weakened yet enters the luxurious lawyer Surya Teja (played by Priyadarshi). Priyadarshi’s brilliant performance in the form of Teeja shines here. This is never their sharp in-court exchanges, dialogue distribution and sometimes-up sentiments. Keep in mind, the actor is known for his script-managed character options, as in 2016 ‘Pelli Chopulu’, 2019’s ‘Tholi Prema’ and others.
See this post on InstagramA post shared by Priyadarshi Pulikonda (@Preyadarshe)
Each actor in the film is originally mixed in his respective character. So much that you forget that you are watching a film. The cool efficiency of the public prosecutor, the calm frustration of the defense lawyer, the hollow staring of the boy’s mother – each performance is soaked in realism. There are no stars here, only stories – and it makes the film feel more real.
POCSO Act – finally addressed with honesty
Here’s the matter: Mainstream Indian cinema rarely talks about the safety of children (POCSO) Act with sexual offenses. And when this happens, it is either sensational or barely scratched on the surface.
‘Court’ does not take easy route. This forces you to face gray areas – what happens when the law designed to save children is armed by the prejudices of the society? How long is a consent relationship between two teenagers seen as a crime? And what happens when the law was originally made for children, remains unknown for them?
The film does not answer easy, because real life is not either. A scene, especially, lives with you: innocent Chandu on the stand, confused and frightened, is unable to understand how the only game like playing home was put in jail. It is intestinal. And is necessary.
See this post on InstagramA post shared by Priyadarshi Pulikonda (@Preyadarshe)
Zero melodrama. just truth.
Does the ‘court’ make it so powerful what it does not do. It does not do spoon-feed feelings. No backgrounds are violin, no sudden moral lecture, no last minute plot twists to tie things into a bow.
Instead, you find slow -burn stress, long -term uncomfortable silence and dialogues that feel that they were lifted directly from real life. You will sit through a 10 -minute court room exchange that looks worldly on the surface – but by the end, your heart will be faster.
It does penis
Some films entertain. Others educate. The ‘court’ does both – but whatever separates is his ability. After a long time of the credit role, you would think of the mother who just wanted her son to live a better life. The girl who was never to destroy her life. The prosecutor who was ready to trample on him for an amount of Rs 2 lakh. And the silence in the court room – the way it shouts loudly compared to any gave.
‘Court’ – not for entertainment, but for enlightenment. It is naked not for the play, but for the uncomfortable truth. If you have ever believed that only power wins, or she is much smaller than an act to move love courts, the film can only change your mind.