Megyn Kelly said she doesn’t believe the lawsuit brought by Viva Rana against JPMorgan executive Lorna Hajdini.
Conservative commentator Megyn Kelly reflected on the latest findings of the Viva Rana-Lora Hajdini sexual harassment trial and said she thinks it’s all made up because Lorna Hajdini is too attractive for someone like Rana, she said. Kelly said that while Lorna is very attractive, Viva Rana looks dull, but not special enough for someone to sacrifice their career for him. Kelly also said that Chirayu Rana’s apparent lies about his father’s death and his short tenure at every company he worked for before and after JPMorgan Chase are very suspicious.Podcaster Michael Knowles, who joined Kelly to discuss the issue, pointed out a technical question in the lawsuit. Citing Hazdini apparently told Rana during their sexual encounter ‘I’m sure your little, Asian fish-like wife doesn’t have these cannons’, Knowles said no woman refers to her breasts as ‘cannons’ and the entire lawsuit is Viva Rana’s imagination.Megan Kelly agreed with Knowles and also pointed out that the problem appeared to be Viva Rana, not JPMorgan Chase, as she had not worked anywhere for over 2 years. Kelly also said that the excuse given by Rana’s lawyer for faking his father’s death does not work at all.Rana’s lawyer Daniel Kaiser told The Wall Street Journal that Viva Rana had not faked his father’s death, but rather the bereavement leave was for a father-figure. Kelly said bereavement leave doesn’t work like that; No leave can be taken on the death of the superintendent of an apartment building.A New York state court will hear the case on May 26. Although both the company and Hajdini denied the allegations, the Journal previously reported that JPMorgan had offered Rana about $1 million to settle privately before the lawsuit became public. Rana reportedly rejected it and demanded $20+ million.