US court recorded a decline for blocking Musk, access to data, blocking firing workers

An American judge on Tuesday rejected a request to federal employees to temporarily block Elon Musk and his Government Efficiency Department (DOGE) and reach the agency figures, which reduces the government workforce For President Donald Trump was a win in his dialect.

Fourteen Democratic ruled states filed a case against Musk’s legal rights last week, but District Judge Tanya Chutkan denied his emergency request to stop his actions.

“The plaintiff has not beenar the burden of showing his burden that he would absent adjacent, irreparable damage,” said Chutkan.

Dogi Kasturi is a free-ranging unit operated by the world’s richest person and Trump’s largest donor. The billionaire has played a vocal role in the new administration, in which his agency has targeted to cut hundreds of billions of dollars in government spending.

Their plans have effectively shut down some federal agencies, sent thousands of staff members home and made a legal battle across the country.

In his suit, 14 states claimed that Musk and Dogi lacked statutory rights for their works as they were not formally nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

“(Musk) practices almost uncontrolled power in the executive branch, deciding about the existence of expenditure, contract, government property, regulations and federal agencies,” he said.

In addition, Musk and Dogi have gained “sensitive data, information, systems and technical and financial infrastructure in the federal government”, he said.

14 states demanded the data system of Personnel Management Office and reaching Dogo by reaching the departments of education, labor, health and human service, energy, transport and commerce and ending any of their employees.

– ‘Quite uncertainty’ –

Chutkan said in his judgment, “The court knows that Dogi’s unexpected action has led to a lot of uncertainty and confusion for the plaintiff and many of his agencies and residents.

“But ‘probability’ that defendants can take action that irreleably damage the plaintiff ‘is not enough,” he said.

The cost cut in the musk has a meeting with a legal pushback on several fronts and mixed bags of ruling.

Last week, a separate federal judge picked up a freeze, which he temporarily put on a large -scale purchase scheme introduced by the Trump administration to federal workers.

In the case of mass procurement, Labor Unions representing federal employees had sued for blocking the scheme of Masterminded by Kasturi to reduce the size of the government by encouraging federal workers to leave.

In an email called “Fork in the Road”, more than two million American government employees were proposed to leave with an eight -month salary or risk in the future kule.

According to the White House, more than 75,000 federal employees signed a procurement proposal from the Personnel Management Office.

Trump’s executive functions have been challenged in dozens of court cases and the White House has accused “Judges in Liberal Districts” of “misusing its power” to block the President’s footsteps.

The decisions have come from judges nominated by both Republican and Democratic Presidents, including Trump.

Chutkan, a appointer of former Democratic President Barack Obama, now presided over the case against Trump on charges of conspiring to reverse the results of the 2020 presidential election.

(Except for the headline, the story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is published by a syndicated feed.)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here