United Spirits Q3 Results: Cons PAT up 25% YoY to Rs. 418 crores; Net sales increased 8%. per share Rs. 6 Dividend was declared

United Spirits on Saturday reported a 25% rise in its December quarter consolidated net profit from Rs. 335 crore as against Rs. 418 crores. Profit after tax (PAT) is attributed to the owners of the holding company.

The company’s income from operations is Rs. 7,942, which in the year-ago period was Rs. 7,732 crore is about 3% higher than Rs. Income Rs. 4,248 crore including excise duty.

Consolidated Net Sales Value (NSV) i.e. Revenue of Beverage Alcohol and Sports segment for the quarter stood at Rs. 3,694 crore, compared to Rs. 3,433 crore is 7.6% higher than Rs.

Net profit, however, declined by 10% sequentially compared to Rs 464 crore in Q2FY26. In July-September quarter Rs. 7,199 crores, the topline grew by 10% in the quarter.

The Smirnoff and Royal Challenge maker has issued a dividend per equity share for the financial year ending March 31, 2026 of Rs. Also announced an interim dividend of 6 and set a record date of January 27, 2026. The interim dividend will be paid on or after February 16, 2026.

Also Read: Indiamart Q3 Results: Cons PAT rises 56% YoY to Rs. 188 crores, revenue increased by 13%

United Spirit’s Q3FY26 earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) rose 5.5% to Rs. 599 crores.

NSV for 9MFY26 Rs. 9,888 crore, which is 9.4% higher than the corresponding period of the previous year. This was driven by 9% growth in the standalone business and 16% growth in the sports business housed in 100% subsidiary Royal Challengers Sports Pvt Ltd (RCSPL), the company said in a filing.

Reported EBITDA Rs. 1,903 crore, up 6.7% on gross margin flowthrough from the standalone business. In the first quarter, Rs. 40 crore excluding one-off indirect tax item impact, underlying EBITDA was Rs. 1,943 crore, an increase of 9%.

9MFY26 PAT Rs. 1,299 crore, showing a growth of 11.9% over the previous year.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, opinions and views given by experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times.)