“We should actually work to launch for IPOs. We will apply to our mind and are subject to satisfactory resolution that we must be able to see it. The objective is to see it,” Pandey said.
Talking to ET Now, Pandey said that there are mainly four issues that require a resolution. Governance, Technology, Clearing Corporation and Conduct.
The NSE IPO is probably one of the most anticipated public problems and India’s largest exchange has long been trying to list itself on the BSE but has been unable to do it due to regulatory barriers.
The National Stock Exchange had earlier said that it wanted to launch its IPO, which could defeat Hyundai’s largest public issue record, not for its stock price search but for transparency and responsibility.
“The IPO will increase transparency and responsibility. Our value is worth about 75.7575 lakh crore in the unused market and we should be responsible for the market as India’s largest exchange,” then NSE Chief Business Development Officer Sriram Krishna told journalists in New Delhi.
He said the IPO is not about the search for price because bores has no promoter. “We are a semi-commercial organization,” Krishnan said.
In April last year, MD and CEO Ashish Chauhan said that the NSE was ready to start its IPO process, but Sebi is waiting for the sake.
If the exchange decides to sell 10% of its equity in this issue, the size of the IPO is expected to be Rs 30,000 crore. India is the largest IPO of Life Insurance Corporation in May 2022, India’s largest IPO, followed by Paytm Rs 18,300 crore in November 2021.
The Exchell initially filed its draft Red Harring Prospectus (DRHP) in 2016, but SEBI returned it in 2019, instructing the exchange to refill the exchange after settling the Colocation investigation.
In September, the regulator of the capital markets disposed of the case in a co-place case, citing the absence of sufficient material evidence against the leading stock exchange and its officials Ravi Narain, Chitra Ramakrishna and others.
Following this, the NSE and its former chief executive Vikram Limay and eight others were paid Rs. Settlement case for abusing the trading access point (TAP) system by paying Rs 643 crore.
(Disclaimer: The recommendations, suggestions, opinions and views given by experts are their own. This does not represent the views of the economic time)
(Now you can subscribe to our Etmarkets WhatsApp channel)