Dhruv Rathi criticizes Aditya Dhar, calls Dhurandhar 2 a blatant propaganda
YouTuber Dhruv Rathi has strongly criticized Aditya Dhar’s film Dhurandhar 2, calling it blatant propaganda and accusing the director of promoting BJP’s agenda.
YouTuber Dhruv Rathee has criticized filmmaker Aditya Dhar and his film. Dhurandhar: The Revenge iIn his latest post on
Rathi’s post read, “I called Aditya Dhar a BJP campaigner 3 months ago. Now everyone will see it. In the last film it was subtle, but this time it became so obvious in overconfidence. Remember how I said, well-done campaigning is more dangerous? Now even well-done campaigning is not happening. Lol.”
❮❯
Earlier, Rathi had criticized the trailer of stalwart For excessive depiction of violence. He described the portrayal as harmful, leading actor Ranveer Shorey to defend the filmmaker.
Following the release of the trailer on 18 November, Rathi posted a strongly worded criticism on X. He said, “Aditya Dhar has crossed the limits of cheapness in Bollywood. The extreme violence, gore and torture shown in the trailer of his latest film is equivalent to watching ISIS beheadings and calling it ‘entertainment’. His lust for money is so uncontrolled that he is willingly poisoning the minds of the young generation. This is a chance for the censor board to show whether they have what it takes to kiss people or skin someone alive.” Seeing it being taken off is a big problem.”
Rathi later vowed to challenge the film’s story in an upcoming video. Without naming the film, he said that his next video would “destroy a Rs 300 crore promotional film.” This statement comes soon after Dhurandhar crossed the Rs 300 crore mark at the Indian box office.
On
The controversy highlights the ongoing debate over the film’s content and message. While the film has achieved commercial success, it has also attracted criticism for its depiction of violence and perceived political bias.
Dhruv Rathee’s post sparks discussion on social media, reflects divided opinions Dhurandhar: Revenge. The filmmakers and supporters have defended the film against propaganda claims, maintaining its creative intent.