President Donald Trump’s recent steps to set fire to several senior National Security Council officials of the White House have raised eyebrows, especially in view of the time and circumstances around the decision. A meeting between firing Trump and far-flung activist Laura Lumor comes on heels, who presented his research to the President, making a case to remove some of the employees, inadequately understood for Trump’s agenda, according to a report by the New York Times.
In this case the impact of the Lumor is notable, 9/11 The history of promoting the principles of conspiracy and his frequent presence on Trump’s 2024 successful appearance during the successful White House of 2024. His recent social media activity has also focused on questioning the credibility of some members of Trump’s national security team.
The meeting held at the Oval Office was attended by Vice President JD Vance, Chief of Staff Susie Wils, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and President of President Personnel, Sero Gor. Despite the importance of this meeting, NSC spokesman Brian Hughes refused to comment on the matter, citing the policy of not discussing the matters of the White House personnel.
Lumor’s own word, as expressed in a posting on X, suggested pride and purpose spirit in his role, “I had an honor to meet with President Trump and present him with his research findings … I will continue to work hard to support his agenda, and I will continue the need of the President of the United States, and I will continue the need for strong witting.”
In view of the current criticism around the use of Mike Waltz, the National Security Advisor of the Encrypated Signal App to discuss the plan of a sensitive military operation in Yemen, the time of these firing is also important. Waltz took responsibility for the construction of the text series, but claimed that he did not know that journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, who was accidentally added to the series, was included.
The account of the Goldberg incident, as stated in the Atlantic, highlights the sensitivity of the operation and the potential risks associated with using unsafe communication channels. The fact that Waltz and other top officials were discussing the exact details of the operation, which used time and aircraft, enhances concerns about the security protocols in the White House through an encrypted app.
