Jana Nayagan goes to the vetting committee: What’s next for Vijay’s farewell film?
Vijay’s Jana Nayakan has now been referred to the CBFC’s review committee following complaints about its content. The film’s release is continuously getting delayed amid legal and administrative hurdles.
Thalapathy Vijay’s last film Jan Naygan According to sources, it has been sent to the review committee of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The decision by producer KVN Productions comes weeks after a legal standoff with the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). Vijay producer KL Narayan on Monday evening Jan Naygan Also filed a letter in the Madras High Court registry seeking withdrawal of the writ petition against the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The petition will be heard on February 10 at 10.30 am.
Following these latest developments, reports are coming that the makers are targeting a possible release in February. However, there has been no update from the producer, while the CBFC has remained silent about the revised committee.
Although the path forward remains uncertain, with committee formation deadlines and confidential review processes, fans are eagerly awaiting positive news. Jan Naygan It was scheduled to be released in theaters on January 9. However, it was postponed indefinitely due to delay in the issuance of the censor certificate.
Now that the film is with the revising committee, what does it mean? Jan Naygan?
Understanding the Review Committee Process
During a court hearing, the legal counsel representing the CBFC claimed that the board chairman withheld the certificate after a complaint was filed by a member who watched the film. It claimed that some dialogues in the film could harm or hurt religious sentiments. The complaint also states that the armed forces symbols used in the film have not been monitored by the defense expert as per the rules. After an internal complaint, the film was sent to the review committee.
So, what does a review committee do?
The Revision Committee of the CBFC acts as a part of the governing body when filmmakers are dissatisfied with the decision of the examination committee. According to the official website of the CBFC, the vetting committee consists of the Chairman (or in his absence, a board member) and nine members selected from the advisory panel – none were part of the original examination committee.
Each member watches the entire film without any cuts and independently records his/her verdict. Decisions are made by majority vote, and in case of a tie the presiding officer casts the casting vote. If the Chairperson’s vote does not conform to the majority, the film will be referred to another vetting committee.
Once a consensus is reached, manufacturers are expected to comply with the specifications and submit it to the regional officer. in the matter of Jan NayganThe internal complaint noted that a defense expert was not part of the original investigation committee. Therefore, the review committee is expected to include an expert from the defense sector.
Industry experts estimate that forming the committee alone may take about two weeks, followed by additional time for screening and deliberations. exact date when Jan Naygan It is unknown whether the producers decided to approach the vetting committee.
CBFC team maintained silence
CBFC regional officer D Balamurali said The Hindu There is no information about it on 2 February Jan Naygan’s Certification status may be disclosed until the certificate is issued, citing privacy protocols. This confidentiality extends to all aspects of the review process – from the composition of the committee to the deliberations and recommendations.
“All our investigation process is confidential. Until the certificate is issued, we cannot disclose anything. The law prohibits sharing any such information,” he said. Once the film is certified, the certificate will be uploaded on the official portal of CBFC.
Jan Nayakan vs Censor Board: The story so far
Legal fight between teams Jan Naygan And the CBFC has seen dramatic turns over the past month. On 6 January, the producers approached the Madras High Court over non-release of the censor certificate. On January 9, the single judge directed the CBFC to certify the film with a U/A 16+ certificate, and ruled that the chairman’s decision to send it for review after initial clearance was without jurisdiction. The case was sent back to the Madras High Court due to the Censor Board’s protest against the decision and the producers moving the Supreme Court.
However, on January 27, the Division Bench set aside the single bench order saying that the CBFC was not given adequate opportunity to file its counter affidavit. The court ordered a fresh hearing and allowed the manufacturer to amend his prayer by challenging the Chairman’s decision to withhold the certificate.
The case was returned to the single judge for a fresh hearing. On February 9, he Jan Naygan Filed a petition to withdraw the case and end the legal battle.
what comes next?
Vijay is produced by KL Narayan Jan Naygan on Monday filed a letter in the Madras High Court registry seeking withdrawal of the writ petition against the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The decision was taken as the producers have agreed to send the film back to the vetting committee.
Sources reveal that the petition, which is said to be heard by Justice PT Asha on February 10, has been marked for withdrawal. This follows a move by Vijayan Subramaniam, lawyer at KVN Productions LLP, who formally informed that his client no longer wishes to proceed with the lawsuit.
during the hearing Jan Naygan The team will need to formally explain their position, particularly while pursuing the review committee route together, and express their decision to withdraw the case.
What is the way forward?
KVN Productions’ decision to send the film back to the vetting committee indicates that they are likely to resolve the issue through administrative channels rather than fighting it legally, which could end up being a lengthy process without any timelines. It is unclear when the film will be certified. However, unconfirmed reports are coming that the makers are hoping to release the film by the end of this month. Otherwise, the film may have to wait till summer 2026.
Since Tamil Nadu assembly elections are expected to be announced in late February or early March, the Election Commission of India (ECI) has the right to stop the screening of the film saying that it could influence the voting pattern. Since Vijay is contesting the elections as the leader of his political party, Tamilaga Vetri Kazhagam (TVK). Jan NayganIncluding impassioned speeches, it could be interpreted as political propaganda.
At the moment, theater owners and fans are awaiting clarity on which path – legal or administrative – will ultimately be paved. Jan Naygan’s Theatrical release.
