Tech Entrepreneur Brian Johnson described “anti-aging millionaire”, accused of using nondisclose agreements to silence employees on his startup blueprint about his bizarre behavior.
Under the agreement, the workers had to note that they were wearing “small and sometimes no clothes/no underwear” and “discussion of discussions of sexual activities”, according to a report by the New York Times, which was published last week, Mr. Johnson accused the US newspaper to publish a “Hit piece” about him.
The report stated that workers also had to agree that the 47 -year behavior was “unwanted, derogatory, derogatory, hostile, triggering, unofficial or derogatory”.
However, Mr. Johnson said the opt-in agreement last month “was appropriate for all concerned and is in the best interest of all.”
What NYT report said about Brian Johnson
The report stated that the blueprint employment agreement with the terms of privacy was 20 pages long and included dozens of restrictions.
The 20-Page agreement states that workers should be kept confidential “Personal influence in Bryan’s house, office, his home or office, rent by Bryan or any non-information information about any vehicle/aircraft/aircraft/boats/other methods, which are not publicly accessible, or their homes or such places are not publicly accessible”.
Brian Johnson often wandered with “short clothes” and sometimes tampered with Blooprint’s massive female employees, the news outlet, who had interviewed 30 people, said. But due to the Opt-in Agreement, no one was able to complain.
In 2013, he earned millions from selling his payment firm Brentry to Paple, and began investing the amount in his anti-aging experiments. The report said that he divorced his wife, hired prostitutes and took medicines like acid, ibogine and DMT.
What Brian Johnson said on NYT report
Brian Johnson, whose “Project Blown” inspired Netflix Documentary “Dont Die: The Man Hu Want to Live Forever”, The New York Times said “tried” to come for him, but “missed”.
Hours after the report was published, it was posted on X on Friday,
“He spent a year in excavation, talked to 30 people, including the formerly fired employees, as his former witness to my former (who tried to extract 9 million dollars from me and failed) and still came empty. It was still empty to stop the facts to fit and turn to fit the facts that they were sufficient to publish it hardly,” he said that he said that he had given the NYT.
The New York Times tried to come for me and missed.
Reading like a profile piece to be a takedown ended.
+ He spent a year in excavation
+ 30 talked to people, bowed to the former withdrawn employees
+ Presented my former as his star witness (who tried to remove $ 9 million … pic.twitter.com/Q4OAM7GHPT
– Brian Johnson (@bryan_johnson) March 21, 2025
Last month, Mr. Johnson also responded to the “Fact-Clocking” questions, which were reconciled by the NYT reporter before publishing the story.
Speaking about the opt-in agreement in the blueprint, he said, “I post gambling on social media. I track my night’s erection. My team openly discusses my semen health. We make dunk memes. Instead of letting people walk in the blind, we reveal this upfront, we have no surprise.”
“This is not forced; it is transparency. This practice is appropriate for all concerned and in the best interest of all. If no one aligns with our culture, they are free to work elsewhere. Some are not forced to sign anything else. Opt-in agreement exists to ensure that people understand and give agreed.
Question:
“My reporting shows that you have used privacy agreements in your personal life and also in your businesses, with more than two dozen people in the last ten years. The agreements I have seen in the last few years have increased for a very long time and …
– Brian Johnson (@bryan_johnson) 24 February, 2025
Mr. Johnson, who reportedly spends $ 2 million every year to reverse his age, also stated that the privacy agreement is “standard and general”.
He said, “I would be surprised that if you do not sign an employment situation in the New York Times. At the individual level, my life is subject to continuous investigation.
“Over time, our agreements have developed, just as I do everything and improve. The target is accurate. Clegging ends confusion. People know where they stand, and this is a win for all,” said Mr. Johnson.
