Housefull 5 changes cruelty in 5 comedy, and it is ugly
In ‘Housefull 5’, a digitally constructed parrot is beaten and beaten for persistent laughs. But when did the beating of a parrot become a joke? When did we decide that it was funny?

In short
- Housefull 5 showed a scene with a parrot, which was violently attacked
- This visual slap normalizes animal cruelty as a source of humor
- Digitally manufactured parrots, Gucci, are shown in a cruel battle with prominent actors
This crazy jokes and creepy men were going to be a women’s comedy. However, it will also make a joke of animal cruelty. If anything, ‘Housefull 5’ is an anti -comedy, where the humor is excluded from an animated parrot -there is beating.
Between many of its scenes – problematic and callus – Akshay Kumar, Abhishek Bachchan and Ritish Deshmukh fight with a parrot. A digital manufactured, colored parrot, named Gucci, who speaks and copy. The producers establish that he is an avatar of a parrot seen in one of the previous ‘Housefull’ films, and here is to take revenge on the trop like ‘Om Shanti Om’ from Akshay’s Julius. As it seems absurd, it is still cured until the manufacturers included a hard fighting scene between parrot and three prominent men – in an attempt to add some silly laughter at a single foolish point.
As the parrot tries to attack Julius, he is caught, the body is slammed, beaten with a frying pan, thrown against the walls, almost hung for burning, and sucked in a vacuum cleaner. None of these makes you laugh, but helps you understand the kind of humor that tickle the manufacturers – the way the violence sees violence, even towards the animals, as a slap gold. The parrot is AI-Janit, it does not look at any less cruel, as it is more about the intentions, and they are ready to show for cheap laughs.
This scene stands out for its disturbing effects. This is more with normalizing cruelty as comedy – you ask yourself that it is far away to see comedy in cruelty. You will also have to see this scene in a big picture, where the most popular faces of the Indian film industry are seen contributing to the desensitis of animal cruelty in the country, where such cases are often rejected or low-reported.
Using a digital manufactured bird to execute the violent view, manufacturers have further proved how they do not care that they increase the idea that cruelty is acceptable. This is not a case of going out of their hands. In fact, the creators feel that they have complete control to do conscious, script and glory, especially because in a digitally produced bird drama.
A parrot for laughter does not care for cruelty, the inconvenience of the audience, which also comes from a deep flawed and insensitive comic instinct. You can move forward and forgive them. If their jokes do not descend well in a film, but how they are forgiven, if they let you sink deeply in their seats, then covering your face as you see a parrot subject to the tireless violence on the big screen?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgqut1wm2qk
For a film supported by the leading faces in the industry, and a major production house, ‘Housefull 5’ is nothing more than the tone-deaf representation of the worst comedy. This shows shocking apathy towards the cultural influence of its content – both of them shows something else about how low the mainstream cinema has its own demand.
The audience enjoys one side from one side, but when the cruelty becomes currency, it is time that we re -examined our collective understanding of the cost of comedy.