Foreign short sellers triggered stock crash with critical reports in India, and out of the profit, reports from

Foreign short sellers triggered stock crash with critical reports in India, and out of the profit, reports from

Proxy firm Inorver has released a report in which some outlined the modus operandi of some foreign short sellers, who start taking positions in target companies and benefit from the fall in their stock prices after the report is announced.

“Foreign research outfits are not registered with Sebi, can publish reports on Indian companies without subject to Indian regulatory scrutiny – while their actions directly affect Indian investors and markets.”

The report has come in the background of US -based Viceroy Research, called Vedanta Resources, a British company led by billionaire Anil Agarwal, “parasite”, which “drains systematically” to its Indian unit, which the group targeted it.

Inorver said short -seller reports have become significant market events, resulting in severe instability and severe testing of targeted companies.

These companies first establish a short position in the company’s securities, which are then published by publishing a critical or adverse research report. The report often stimulates market reactions, sometimes borders of panic. Short sellers offer economic benefits from subsequent movements in stock or bond prices.

In India, the Securities and Exchange Board, India for India (SEBI), has established a regulatory structure for research analysts. Companies and individuals who publish research on Indian securities need to be enrolled with the regulator, ensuring the quality and purpose of related responsibility and observation of published research.

“These rules are designed to protect investors ‘interests and to promote the integrity of the market by holding the investors’ interests and holding the analysts registered on professional and moral standards.”

Citing recent reports against Indian groups, he says that SH Fashore research companies released critical reports while keeping economic interests in securities, however, did not respond to regulatory summons or cooperate with Indian officials.

This context is another U.S. The short vendor was a Hindanburg research, which in January 2023 released a scandalous report against the Adani group. Hindanburg, who has been a shut -shop since then, did not respond to a summons issued by SEBI.

“Indian regulators can apply compliance and responsibility to domestic research analysts, but have a limited shelter against uncontrolled foreign bodies. This creates a regulatory distance, allowing companies to influence Indian markets without clinging to the same standards of transparency.”

“The accuracy of these reports is often discussed, but the incentive structure- where the financial gain combines with the negative market results- raises concerns about purposes, the interruption of the market sometimes prefers balanced analysis.”

Calling for a strong security need, he said that this mobility illuminates the importance of current dialogue around the standards of notification, cross-border regulatory cooperation and advanced investors’ education as global capital markets become more and more interconnected.

Inorver has said that as an independent proxy consultant Pay FirM, he has made recommendations in the past to support and oppose various resolutions in the Vedanta group companies based on the nature and current regime standards of the proposal.

“Regular resolutions, such as the adoption of financial statements or re-appointment of AUD Deaters, have generally supported when ads and processes meet regulatory and best-business standards,” he said.

At Vedanta’s proposed demger, Ingover noted that it was supported by leading proxy consultant companies (including English), who recommended votes in favor of the Dimerger.

“These advisers have cited the potential benefits, such as enhanced management focus, improved capital market access, and investors have the opportunity to keep shares in businesses with different investment profiles.

On the observations of the Viceroy Report on Entity Structures, Angover said that such structures are quite common and legal.

“Infrastructure, mining and energy zero businesses require large clear investments and are often employed by holding company structures for regulatory, tax and operational reasons,” adding that parent companies are often used at the group level (sometimes more favorable) and the use of services.

“This model is not specific to India – Glancore, viewed with Anglo American and BHP, uses similar compositions globally.”

Inorver has also published that various regulatory standards in India require adequate advertisements for companies, which help stakeholders provide information.

“Indian Regulations (SEBI, Companies Act) requires extensive announcement of related-party transactions, inter-corporate loans and dividend flow.”

The Vedanta Group rejected the claims in the Viceroy Report, stating that there was a contaminated combination of selective false information and baseless allegations for defaming the report.

(Now you can subscribe to our Etmarkets WhatsApp channel)

Zeen Subscribe
A customizable subscription slide-in box to promote your newsletter
[mc4wp_form id="314"]