Along with every jump in artificial intelligence, concern about its impact on creative industries is also increasing. Since generative AI equipment increases rapidly, more than 400 leading British artists, writers and artists have issued a petition to the Prime Minister Sir Kir Stmper, urging the government to increase copyright security in front of the technology that is rapidly developed. Open letters supported by cultural data such as Dua Lipa, Sir Elton John, Sir Ian McClen, and Florence Welch, warning that without proper safety measures, the creator can effectively hand over his work to technical firms. It comes after a month when American celebrities filed a similar letter.

According to the BBC, the letter states, “We are wealth makers, we reflect and promote national stories, we are future innovations, and AI we need as much as energy and computer skills.” “The status of the UK as a creative powerhouse” says.

Their demand data (use and access) focus on an amendment to the bill, which is presented by Barrowon Biban Kidron, which attempts to compel AI developers to tell that copyright tasks are being used to train their models. Artists argue that it will pave the way for fair licensing arrangements and preserve the situation in Britain as a global leader in creative industries.

The letter says, “Failing to offer this safety would be the same to overcome our work,” the letter adds, the Janak AI highlights the concerns about the erosion of the rights of the creators amid the rapid development of the AI ​​equipment.

Other signators include Kazuo Ishiguro, Kate Bush, Robbie Williams, Coldplay, Tom Stopard and Richard Curtis. Sir Paul McCartney, who has previously expressed concern about the artists who mimic AI, also signed the letter.

The intervention comes ahead by an important vote at the House of Lords on Monday, where the amendment will be debated. Baronic Kidron argues that transparency from AI firms is important. “The UK is in a unique position to take his place as a global player in the International AI supply chain,” he said. “But understanding the opportunity requires transparency provided in my amendments, which are necessary to create a vibrant licensing market.”

However, not all voices agree with the status of the artists. Julia Wilmins, the co-founder of the Center for British Progress Think Tank, told the BBC that such proposals could obstruct the UK competition. He warned, “A restrictive copyright regime will develop the AI ​​development, cool domestic innovation and directly damage the UK economy.”

As mentioned by the BBC, there is a debate between increasing stress on the use of creative functions to train the AI ​​system. In February, Annie Lenox and Damon Alberan released a silent protest album to highlight the opposition to government schemes.

The ministers initially proposed an “opt-out” system, allowing developers to use online material until the right holders objected. But Baikalash from the creative community has inspired a reconsideration. Nobel Prize winning writer Ishiguro criticized the idea of ​​bending copyright rules in favor of “Mammath Corporation”, stating: “It is necessary that they get this right.”

Responding to increasing dissatisfaction, a government spokesperson told the BBC: “We want our creative industry and AI companies to flourish, that is why we are consulting on the package of measures that we hope that we will work for both areas.”

The spokesperson said, “We are clear that no change will be considered until we are completely satisfied.” The government confirmed that it would publish a report and economic impact assessment as part of the next stages in the ongoing consultation.