Singer Kumar Sanu’s ex-wife Rita Bhattacharya has responded to the defamation suit filed against her in the Bombay High Court, alleging that her recent interviews and social media statements have caused significant damage to her reputation. The suit seeks damages of Rs 50 crore, which is much higher than the Rs 30 lakh reported in some media outlets. Sanu’s legal team has denied these allegations and called them false and malicious.

In response to the legal notice, Rita expressed surprise and disappointment at the scale of damages sought by Sanu. Rita said, “I am shocked. He is filing a case against the mother of his three elder sons. In the paper he has sent me, he is asking for Rs 50 crore. I don’t know how Sanu is dreaming that I have so much money. It is really sad.” Bombay Times,

The lawsuit also cites an agreement reached during their divorce in 2001, which stipulated that neither party would press charges against the other. Kumar Sanu’s legal representatives claim that Rita has breached this contract through her recent public comments.

Rita and Sanu were married in 1986 and separated after seven years. Their divorce was finalized in 2001. The couple have three sons, the youngest of whom is now 31 years old. Rita has said that the ongoing legal dispute is affecting her family life.

In her comments, Rita appealed to Kumar Sanu asking him to reconsider his actions for the sake of his children. She said, “I will see him in court. And I will beg Sanu with folded hands – just try to be a good man and be a father to my three children. If you can’t love us, at least don’t harass us and bother us anymore.”

Legal observers say the case hinges on the provisions of the divorce settlement and whether Rita’s comments amount to a contractual breach. The Bombay High Court will determine whether his public statements justify the substantial damages sought by Sanu.

While both parties await the court’s decision, Rita has indicated her intention to defend herself against the charges. The case has attracted attention due to the personal nature of the dispute and the high-profile individuals involved.