The debate surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death has taken another sharp turn, with Candace Owens doubling down on her controversial stance. Speaking on his podcast, Owens said he is “99.9% confident” that Tyler Robinson was not the gunman, pointing to a key forensic detail that has now entered the public conversation. According to recent legal filings, the bullet recovered during the autopsy could not be matched to the rifle allegedly belonging to Robinson.That one claim has reignited an already polarized case. At first, investigators thought Robinson was the prime suspect, but now Owens says it’s much more complicated. Her comments show that she not only doubts the official story, but rejects it outright. This has raised more questions about how the investigation has been handled.
Candace Owens challenges the official narrative and calls for a thorough investigation
Owens did not hold back when addressing the new developments, insisting that the case against Robinson is seriously flawed. He claimed to have spoken to sources close to the investigation and alleged that federal authorities may have built a misleading case.“There was an overwhelming amount of evidence that the feds set this kid up as an idiot. Everybody in town, all the local sheriff’s department, the SWAT team, they believe the feds came in and started lying… I’m talking to people who have direct knowledge, and they all believe the feds set it up… Why wouldn’t I testify for the defense? I want to find Charlie’s real killer. I don’t want to find some random kid. Want whoever they’re sticking it on,” she said.She went even further, expressing near certainty about Robinson’s innocence as the shooter.“I feel the exact opposite of Charlie Kirk’s wife. I feel almost certain that Tyler Robinson did not fire the shot… I would say I feel 99.9% certain that Tyler Robinson did not single-handedly shoot Charlie Kirk from the rooftop… I’m going to say 0.1% because I don’t know, you should never say 100%… I follow the facts, and Tyler Robinson did not do it. That rooftop But he’s not the only one with a gun, okay?”Owens also raised questions about other elements of the case, including alleged text messages and forensic findings involving the weapon. He argued that inconsistencies were constantly coming to light, urging critics to either provide details or remain silent.As Robinson’s legal team pushes for more time to review evidence before a preliminary hearing, the case now stands at a crossroads. Public opinion is increasingly divided, and Owens’ comments ensure that the conversation is far from over.