Blake Lively dismisses justin Baldoni’s $ 400 million defamation trial
Blake Lively Justin rejects Baldoni’s $ 400 million defamation case, calling it “tamasic”. Baldoni counted the lively, Ryan Reynolds and The New York Times. The test of March 2026 is scheduled.
Blake Liveli has asked an American judge to dismiss Justin Baldony’s $ 400 million defamation trial, it is called a “tamasic” attempt to punish him to speak about sexual harassment.
According to a report by Reuters, Livali lawyers argued in a Manhattan federal court that Baldoni’s suit is part of “a terrible campaign to bury and destroy him for making allegations against him. He said that the law has prevented the defamation cases from being used to silence those who speak about harassment.
Lively, who has accused Baldoni of sexually assaulting Baldony while filming “It’s Ends With As”, is also seeking unlikely triple and punitive loss for allegedly distinguished and emotional damage due to Baldoni, his production company Wafer Studio and others.
Baldoni and Vafar Studio counted the vibrant, her husband Ryan Ryanolds, her campaigner and New York Times, alleging that they launched a spot against her. According to Reuters, Baldoni accused Live that he was trying to “hesack” the film and convicted her when his promotional efforts led the public backlash.
Livali’s lawyers argued that Baldony failed to prove that he worked with “real malicious” by making deliberately false allegations. He cited Baldoni’s 30 August 2024, text messages, in which he alive described as someone living as a person who is “really right.”
Livali’s lawyers argued that Baldony failed to prove that he worked with ‘real malicious’, meaning that he did not deliberately make false allegations. He cited Baldoni’s 30 August 2024, text messages, in which he described as a lively person, which is “really right.”
In a joint statement, Livli’s lawyers, Michael Gotlib and Esra Hudson, called Baldony’s trial “deeply of the legal process” and said that her attempt to sue “Ms. Lively in Oblivion” has only created more legal trouble for her.
Meanwhile, Rrenalds has also demanded dismissal, arguing that Baldoni’s case is based on “hurt feelings”, when Reynolds reportedly called him “hunter”. Reynolds argue that their comments are preserved under constitutional free speech laws.
The New York Times, who was sued on the controversy on the controversy, has defended his reporting, which has been denied any role in supporting the claims of the vibrant. A test is scheduled for March 2026.
